1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. In the first instance court within the scope of the trial of this court, the plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant and co-defendant C of the first instance court on the principal lawsuit for the delivery of the real estate of this case, and the defendant filed a claim against the defendant for the overdue rent, etc., and the defendant filed a claim against the plaintiff for the refund of lease deposit, necessary expenses and beneficial expenses. The first instance court, among the plaintiff's principal lawsuit, rejected the claim for the delivery of real estate against the defendant and co-defendant C of the first instance court, and dismissed the claim for the overdue rent, etc., among the plaintiff's counterclaim, and partly accepted the claim for the return of lease deposit and the claim for repayment

(The first instance court recognized part of the Plaintiff’s claim such as overdue rent against the Defendant, but determined as above by deducting the Defendant’s overdue rent from the Defendant’s claim to return the lease deposit. Accordingly, since only the Defendant appealed with respect to the part against the Defendant out of the part regarding the counterclaim in the first instance judgment, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the above appeal part.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts: (a) the judgment of the court of first instance regarding a counterclaim is based on the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are deemed legitimate even if the evidence No. 13 submitted by the defendant to this court was included in the evidence No. 13). 3. Judgment on the counterclaim claim 3.

A. On May 31, 2007, the Defendant concluded a lease contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on the condition that the instant store is KRW 700,000 per month, management expenses, KRW 30,00 per month, and water rate of KRW 50,00 per month, and KRW 80,000 per month from September 201 when the lease contract is renewed thereafter.