1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants’ status and basic facts are the executive directors of S Co., Ltd. for the purpose of constructing, managing, and operating a R tourist resort development project (hereinafter “R project”). From March 31, 2014 to July 31, 2014, Defendant A worked for U.S. as the subsidiaries of T&T, a major shareholder of the said S, and worked for the purpose of managing, operating, disposing of, and performing general affairs concerning R business as the subsidiaries of the said T&, from April 1, 2014 to July 31, 2014.

Defendant

B The head of the above V’s management support team, the head of the department belonging to the company’s facility team, the head of the defendant C, the head of the planning team belonging to W, the other subsidiary of the above T, the head of the division belonging to the above W’s marketing team, the defendant E, the director belonging to the above W’s financial team, the head of the division belonging to W’s financial team, and the defendant G operates the service supplier.

On the other hand, the victim X entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to have the right to operate and manage the business facilities prior to the completion of the contract with the Plaintiff, which is a company with the purpose of automobile competition consulting, such as the first proposal for the business, the human rights group and the above business, and possessed the R facilities while managing them.

Nevertheless, S, unlike the above concession agreement, intended to change the operator to V, did not approve it in the human group, and eventually, decided to change the operator to the above W. After requesting the termination of the human group, S, which unilaterally terminated the operation and management contract with X prior to completion, based on the completion of the human group.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A, B, C, and D Defendants were illegal to notify the above unilateral termination thereof. As such, Defendant A, C, and D continued to manage and occupy the facility by asserting that X had occupied the facility in accordance with the above operation and management contract, and Defendant A, B, C, and D continued to exercise the power.