A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 27, 2015, at around 23:11, the Defendant: (a) asked whether or not a policeman affiliated with the Kimpo Police Station Dox, who was called out after having received 112 a report, had a intent to pay for the drinking value; (b) asked him/her whether or not he/she was “I am am son, I am son, I am son, I am bling E head, and then arrested a flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of performance of performance of duties, and used him/her to take the right-hand part of E, as his/her head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Service log for a police box and service log for 112 reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of a photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., that the defendant reflects his/her mistake and that