Imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of Nos. 2 and 10 in the judgment of the accused, for the crimes of No. 1, 3 through 9, 11 through 21 in the judgment of the accused.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a term of fraud at the Chuncheon District Court on February 6, 2013 and has been sentenced to one year.

3. 21. A person whose judgment became final and conclusive and who was paroled on August 14, 2013 and whose remaining term of punishment has expired on October 16, 2013.

"2014 Highest 7484"

1. Even if the Defendant received the so-called prepaid payment from the victim C (40) who operates amusement centers, the Defendant did not intend to work as an employee at the amusement center operated by the victim as an employee or to complete the payment of the lump sum.

Nevertheless, on September 11, 2013, the Defendant stated that “the Defendant will work as a pre-paid employee at the pre-paid 5.5 million won in advance” to the victim at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in the prime city, and then was remitted from the damaged party to the pre-paid 5.5 million won through the pre-paid cooperation account in the name of the Defendant at that time.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds the above 5.5 million won.

"2014 Highest 8503"

2. On October 17, 2012, the Defendant borrowed 2,200,000 won from the third-class law firm of the building D in Nam-gu, Incheon, to the victim F, “The Defendant will be an employee at an entertainment establishment operated by the host Party on the face of the week by borrowing 2,200,000 won under the name of the

In the sense that payment is promised, a promissory note against the borrowed money will be notarized.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even though the period of suspension has expired after the suspension of the detention on July 9, 2012, the defendant was in the state of a person who was not sentenced to imprisonment. Therefore, even if he received the above money from the injured party, he/she did not have the ability or intent to work at the victim's entertainment business.

Nevertheless, the defendant acquired 2,200,000 won from the injured party, i.e., the money borrowed from the seat, through the account (G) of the Suhyup Federation of the defendant's name.

"2014 Highest 8711"

3. On August 23, 2013, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would work five million won in advance as a principal employee at a mutual coffee shop located in the prime city around 17:00.”

However, the defendant is true.