logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.10.23 2018고단5383 (1)
사기방조
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B The facts are as follows: (a) a person who purchased a house or a person who did not have the intention or ability to pay a house security loan but only borrowed the name for the purpose of a fee, and (b) an applicant for a house security loan with the said real estate as security at a financial institution; and (c) as if the above lender actually purchased a real estate (multi-family housing, loan), a false sales contract and a false employment certificate, etc. were submitted to the financial institution and acquired the loan by deceiving

B On November 21, 2014, the Defendant filed an application for a housing mortgage loan with the victim D bank under the name of the Defendant, who was introduced by the Defendant, a book for soliciting loan holders, at the victim D bank military service branch located in Si, Gunsan-si, and the fact was that the Defendant was not purchased at KRW 140 million in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, U.S. and was paid only interest for six months at financial institutions, and all the Defendant of B and the loan applicants were thought not to pay the principal amount of the loan at all. Although the Defendant did not have worked at H, even though he did not purchase the said house at the State, he received a transfer of KRW 100 million in the name of the damaged person as a loan by submitting a false contract, ( state) H employment certificate, and a certificate of source collection of income tax on the income tax on Class A labor income.

On November 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that B was to receive a housing mortgage loan from a victim D bank using a false transaction agreement as seen above; (b) however, (c) provided the victim with a false transaction agreement according to the direction of B in return for a loan in the name of the user; and (d) applied for a housing mortgage loan to the victim, thereby aiding and abetting B to obtain a loan of KRW 100 million from the victim as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow