The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months) by the lower court is too unreasonable;

(2) On the first day of the appellate trial, the lower court rendered a sentence by taking account of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstance after the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., under favorable circumstances in which A, other than the Defendant, was led to the crime of this case, equality in the case of larceny, etc., which became final and conclusive, the Defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, and the Defendant committed the crime of this case at a disadvantage that the damage was not recovered.

Even when considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment within a reasonable scope, sufficiently taking into account all the circumstances regarding sentencing.

Furthermore, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.