beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.
The seized corporate bank passbook (No. 1) shall be returned to the victim C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On February 2, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and six months with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Western District Court, and on October 30, 2008, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Defendant to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. On January 27, 2011, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Defendant to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Central District Court and completed the execution of the sentence on June 22, 2012.
"2013 Gohap121"
1. At around 22:00 on January 20, 2013, the Defendant habitually stolen scar in the “E” page located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu, and at the soup, scar equivalent to KRW 900,00,000, the victim F was the victim’s side of the victim, who was the victim F, was the victim.
From November 28, 2012 to March 10, 2013, the Defendant habitually stolen property worth KRW 5,632,000, in total, eight times as shown in the annexed crime list, as shown in the annexed crime list.
2. On January 21, 2013, the Defendant confirmed that, while using the wireless Internet service with a stolen smartphone as set forth in paragraph 1 in the vicinity of the Hanyang University located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant sent the victim G to F a message to the effect that “The number of accounts entered in the benefits was crossed out,” “The new information would have changed.”
Accordingly, the defendant committed F in mind with the intention of receiving money from the victim by informing the defendant of the deposit account used by him of the money.
The Defendant, by sending the Kakao Stockholm message to the effect that “the Defendant lost the passbook, which would have changed to send it to HAB bank,” the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 14.5 million won from the victim to the said corporate bank account under the name of the Defendant on the same day, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.
"2013, 184".