1. The disposition that the Defendant extended departure from Korea to the Plaintiff on January 8, 2020 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff failed to pay national taxes of KRW 1,693,725,820 in total as indicated below.

The amount of gift tax that has not been collected for the year of payment of the tax item due on June 30, 1998; the amount of gift tax of KRW 249,298,290 on March 21, 200; the amount of capital gains tax of KRW 165,087,040 on March 21, 200; the amount of global income tax of KRW 1997,027,640 on January 31, 2001; the amount of global income tax of KRW 19,027,640 on March 21, 200; the amount of KRW 30,754,84,840 on global income of KRW 199,40 on May 15, 201; the amount of capital gains tax of KRW 199,70 on global income of KRW 30,540 on May 23, 200, the amount of capital gains tax of KRW 1608.

B. On February 14, 2018, the Defendant issued a disposition prohibiting departure to the Plaintiff on the grounds of national tax delinquency and extended the prohibition period by six months.

C. On September 24, 2009, the Plaintiff confirmed the fact that the Plaintiff acquired U.S. nationality and lost the Republic of Korea nationality, and issued a disposition of suspension of departure (from May 1, 2019 to July 31, 2019) against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Defendant did not pay national taxes pursuant to Articles 29(1) and 4(1) of the Immigration Control Act.

The Defendant extended the period of departure suspension by three months pursuant to Articles 29(2) and 4-2 of the Immigration Control Act. On January 8, 2020, the Defendant issued an extension of the period of departure suspension (from January 30, 2020 to April 30, 2020; hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 13, 16, 19, 20 each statement, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Grounds for appeal and the attached Forms of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes and the entries in relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

3. Facts as seen earlier prior to the lawfulness of the instant disposition, each of the statements as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 2, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, and 22, Eul’s evidence Nos. 9, 18, 21, 22, and 23, and the fact inquiry as to the head of Seoul Immigration and Immigration Office of the court’s Seoul Immigration and Immigration.