logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.17 2016고단3039
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 12, 2016, 01:40, the Defendant reported that the Defendant was assaulted at the Defendant’s house located in Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City B at the Defendant’s house located in Busan Metropolitan City on June 12, 2016, and was dispatched from D’s security guards belonging to the Busan Metropolitan City Police Station C police station, which called “I wish to smoke for one cigarette,” and the Defendant’s “I wish to smoke for one cigarette,” and the Defendant’s “I want to see it in a way that I want to smoke for one cigarette.”

“Arre,” and “Arre, the flab nbb, the other home flab, to the other home flab.

“Absing to the floor of “,” and assaulted the parts of the said D on one hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. The application of the investigation report (No. 1 list of evidence), each photographic statute;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (no person subject to special sentencing] shall interfere with the performance of public duties;

2. The sentence of this case shall be imposed in the same way as the sentence, in consideration of the circumstances, including the fact that the nature of the offense in this case is not good, but has not been identical to that of the previous offense exceeding the fine, the fact that the offense has been recognized and the mistake has been pened in depth;

arrow