[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendants were not the narcotics handler, they dealt with psychotropic drugs-related psychotropic drugs-related Mesophopons (one philopon; hereinafter referred to as “philopon”).

1. Defendant A

A. On February 2019, the Defendant issued approximately 600,000 won to the person who was named in the road located in the city of Busan at the end of February 3, 2019 and received approximately 0.21g of the penphone.

Accordingly, the defendant purchased and sold philophones.

B. (1) On February 2019, the Defendant added approximately 0.03g of philopon to a single-use injection machine at the residence of the Defendant under the building D, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, and added it to the Defendant’s arms. (2) On February 2, 2019, the Defendant injectedd approximately 0.03g of philopon to a single-use injection machine at the residence of the said Defendant at the night of the end of February 2019, and injected it into the Defendant’s arms.

3. On August 31, 2019, around 22:00, the Defendant, parked approximately 0.03g of philopon in a single-use vehicle in the Defendant’s car parked in the parking lot located in the Busan Metropolitan City YY C, and injected it into the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, the defendant administered philophones over three times in total.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1-B(1), 0.03g of philopon from A in a single-use injection machine, dilutioned the Defendant’s arms, and attempted to dively in a single-use injection, but failed to find the bloodline. (B) The Defendant did not divee the Defendant’s arms at the date and time specified in the foregoing paragraph 1-B(2) and at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1-B(2), 0.03g of philopon into a single-use injection machine, dilutioned the Defendant’s arms, but failed to find the bloodline.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to administer philophones over two times in total, but attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to narcotics appraisal certificates and gene appraisal certificates;

1. Criminal facts;