A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 22:20 on August 24, 2012, the damage of property: (b) performed drinking in front of the Ecafeteria operated by the victim D, and found in the restaurant, and (c) collected two chemical parts owned by the victim before the entrance at the entrance, and damaged them by attaching a fireproof and an entrance locks equivalent to KRW 100,000 at the market price.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods for use by public offices, on the ground that G, who was called up after receiving a report of disturbance at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), was aboard the Defendant at the 112 patrol forces of the Daejeon Police Station, the Daejeon Police Station, the 112 patrol HH Rason affiliated with the Daejeon Police Station, and walking the back glass windows of the HH HH Rason affiliated with the Daejeon Police Station, thereby impairing the public goods used by public offices so that the amount equivalent to 71,500 won of the market price would be exceeded.

3. On May 3, 2012, the injured Defendant: (a) around 21:20, at the “K Indoor Packaging Car” operated by the Victim J (Inn, 50 years of age) of Daejeon Daejeon, on the ground that he would not sell previously, and (b) found the victim’s complaint on the ground that the victim reported, and (c) sought the complaint for the reason that the victim would have expressed the victim’s desire to do so; and (d) took the image of the face part in which the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Testimony of witness G;

1. Statement of each police statement to D and J;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant suffered from a stimulative disorder while under the influence of alcohol at the time of the above crime, and that the defendant was in the state of mental disorder or mental disorder. Thus, considering the circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, the method and method of the crime, the defendant's act before and after the crime, etc., the defendant was treated with alcohol at the time of the above crime, even though he was found to have been treated as a stimulative disorder at the time of the above crime.