logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.02.11 2014고단4349
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 12:40 on November 6, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim, on the ground that the victim’s DNA car driven by the victim C (Nam, 51 years of age) and the Defendant’s bicycle walked with each other, on the grounds that the victim resisted against each other while driving a car and the Defendant’s bicycle, and the Defendant’s bicycle, he was able to walk up on the part of the face of the victim who was seated in the driver’s seat. On the other hand, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as the victim’s knee and knee part of the victim who continued to feass in the driver’s seat and the part of the victim’s face by drinking in a number of times.

2. Around November 6, 2014, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly by publicly speaking the victim at the F District District of the Daejeon Police Station in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, on the ground that: (a) the police officers belonging to the F District and several construction employees belonging to the F District and the victim, who were the victim, executed the warrant of execution of a fine, on the grounds that the victim, was executing the warrant of execution of a penal penalty against the Defendant; (b) on the grounds that there are several persons around the region, such as police officers belonging to the F District and H, who are in a large number of persons.

3. On November 6, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, around 14:05, by opening the back door of the patrol car (I) in order for the Defendant to hand over the Defendant’s personal body, the victim of the said FF district, at around 15, Seo-gu, Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office, 78, the 15th, Seo-gu, Daejeon District public Prosecutor’s Office, and obstructed police officers’ legitimate performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning C and G;

1. A complaint filed by G;

1. A H statement;

1. A report on fines, the arrest of the relevant prisoner;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts of the scene and circumstances of damage and G;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively.

arrow