The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of grounds for appeal: The defendant's act of misunderstanding facts and misunderstanding legal principles did not meet the requirements for legitimate acts, such as balance, urgency, and supplement of legal interests.

Although the court below rendered a judgment of innocence against the defendant, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Based on the circumstances stated in its reasoning, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the facts charged in this case on the ground that the Defendant’s act does not violate social norms, and thus, the illegality is excluded.

The objective of this paper is to raise questions as to why the expression "D" constitutes a crime of defamation of reputation, and to raise objections as to why the injured party made the above expression, and that the victim made the above expression, and that the victim raised objections as to why the party members of the I Party who made the above expression:

In full view of the facts revealed, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there are errors in the misapprehension of legal principles and mistake of facts alleged by the prosecutor.

subsection (b) of this section.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.