1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that is established around March 10, 1958 and ordinarily employs approximately 2,200 workers and engages in various transportation business and automobile rental business.

A participant was employed by the plaintiff around December 10, 1990 and worked as the team leader from around 2006 to April 2013.

B. On June 1, 2015, the Plaintiff sent an e-mail to the Intervenor at around 00:30 on June 1, 2015, stating that the Plaintiff “a committee shall be held on June 3, 2015 on the grounds of the following disciplinary action” to the Intervenor.

In unfair use of promotional expenses (payment of corporate cards), (Insufficient supervision of the standards for disciplinary action by the Standing Committee, embezzlement of public funds referred to in subparagraph 4, 26, loss of 30,000 won) - Use of corporate card personal use (for example: 2.80,000 won after the end of the week) - Liability Company for a fine for negligence in violation of payment of corporate card for golf use payment (for lack of supervision and loss of subparagraph 4 of the standards for disciplinary action by the Standing Committee, loss of subparagraph 30) - Payment of fines for negligence in the Company from 11 to 4 years in total from the date of transfer to customers of the imposition of rental car fines by the Company due to the delay in the business of transferring the fines for negligence to the Company, the manager of the above disciplinary deliberation matters (for lack of supervision of subparagraph 4 of

C. As scheduled on June 3, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) held the upper punishment committee for an intervenor as scheduled on June 17, 2015; and (b) deliberated by the 'the upper punishment committee for an intervenor around June 17, 2015; (c) as a result of the deliberation by the 'the upper punishment committee for an intervenor’, the intervenor transferred the notice of 'the notice of 'the fines for negligence for a siren for four years since 2011 to the actual user to the customer and caused the loss of KRW 60,000,000,000 to the customer by neglecting his/her legitimate obligation as an employee; and (d) paid the amount of approximately 22 cases and 380,000,000 to the corporate card for personal purposes, including providing meals at his/her home after the end of the week; and (c) between the employees made on June 9, 201