logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.19 2013가단220776
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: 5% per annum from April 23, 2011 to June 19, 2015 with respect to each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 3,00,000 and each of them.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant mainly operates an “F Hospital” located in Ansan-gu, Sinsan-si E (hereinafter “instant hospital”), an elderly specialized hospital operated for the elderly with symptoms of dementia, etc., and the Plaintiffs and Nonparty G are children of the network H (I birth, death on September 25, 2012, and death on September 25, 2012, hereinafter “the deceased”).

B. On July 5, 2010, the Deceased entered into a hospitalization contract with the Defendant by setting the monthly hospitalization cost of KRW 700,000 (hereinafter “instant hospitalization contract”) and hospitalized the said hospital for dementia treatment and recuperation.

C. On July 15, 2010, the physical clinic of the instant hospital did not check the condition of the deceased who was incapable of being aware of due to severe dementia at the physical clinic, and left the hospital’s 30 minutes of the heat clinic on both sides of the deceased while leaving the hospital alone for 30 minutes, thereby suffering 3 degrees of images on the part of the deceased.

K, on April 23, 201, in the instant hospital, had safety devices installed at a bathing bath or had assistants, boomed the deceased’s body in the wheelchairs, and boomed the wheeler, and suffered the deceased’s body back from the wheelchairs, while the deceased boomed the wheeler.

(C) The accident of paragraphs (c) and (d) (hereinafter referred to as the “each accident of this case”). E.

On October 10, 2011, the Deceased was discharged from the instant hospital, and then hospitalized at the Incheon Busan Busan Busan Busan Busan District Hospital until October 22, 201, and thereafter, at the "L Hospital" located in the Nam-gu Incheon District.

September 25, 2012, died.

[Ground of recognition] The whole purport of each of the images and arguments with evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 28, 29, 31 and 34 (including partial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap, and 19 (including partial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) without dispute

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition 1, the deceased suffered the above damages due to each of the accidents of this case caused by the negligence of the defendant's employees, and thus, the defendant as the employer is the above employees' tort.

arrow