The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the course of misunderstanding of facts, when the victim C gets off the victim C and money at the time of the instant case, knife the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife to enter the room before the victim knife knife knife, and the victim C knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knifes

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two years of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. On July 29, 2013, the lower court determined the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of the legal doctrine as to the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of various evidence, i.e., ① the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s failure to receive money accurately assigned to the Victim C and the Defendant’s failure to live together with the Victim C (Evidence No. 131) and the Defendant’s failure to kill the Victim C around January 2013 (Evidence No. 129, 164 of the evidence record, and the Defendant made a statement to China, and returned to China, and the Defendant appears to have made a statement that “the Defendant would die the Victim” and “the Defendant would die the Victim” to receive money from the Victim C, ② the Defendant was kept in custody immediately before the crime was committed, and the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife k.