A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 모욕 피고인은 2016. 3. 27. 23:10 경 인천 옹진군 C 소재 D 파출소 앞에서, 피고인이 음주 운전으로 112 신고한 사건이 처리되는 것을 지켜보다가 처리 과정에 불만을 품고, 피해자 E에게 “ 개새끼야!, 씹쌔끼야!, 내가 누 군 줄 알아 씨 발 새끼야!, 나중에 후회 하지 마!" 라며 큰 소리로 욕설하여 다수인이 있는 자리에서 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant took a bath to the victim E (26 years old) (a police box) who is a policeman belonging to the D (26 years old) carrying out the case of driving alcohol at the place, and assaulted the victim’s chest two times in a erob, and brea the victim’s chest, and boomed the victim’s chest, and control it, “I am am am am amb and amba amba, and how I am am amba am amba amba am amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba amba am.

"A threat to a large voice has interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, E, H, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the same Act (Interference with the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 37 of the Criminal Act, respectively, choice of imprisonment for concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection and orders to provide community service and attend lectures;

1. Scope of recommendations (Interference with the execution of official duties) for the sentencing criteria (Scope of recommendations) / The scope of recommendations for the sentencing criteria / [Scope of recommendations] / The basic area (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) / [ June to one year and four months] / The scope of comparative sentences between six months and one year and four months;

2. The defendant who has rendered a sentence shall be punished by fraud in 1998.