1. The gift contract concluded on November 15, 2013 between the Defendant and B on the apartment indicated in the separate sheet between the Defendant and B is 20,930.

1. Revocation of a fraudulent act;

A. (1) On April 11, 2014, the Plaintiff recognized the cause of the claim (A) as to KRW 19,446,820 as of April 11, 201, with respect to the credit card price and the principal amount of the loan (i.e., KRW 1,376,80 as of KRW 8,069,940 as credit card price) and its overdue interest (i.e., KRW 20,930,949).

(B) On November 15, 2013, B donated to the Defendant, the wife, an apartment as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant apartment”) that is the only real estate at the time of November 15, 2013, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of such donation on November 18, 2013.

(C) At around that time, B’s active property is approximately KRW 450,00,00 of the apartment price of this case, KRW 80,202,871 of the housing mortgage loan to the new bank, a mortgagee, and KRW 44,581,183 of the general loan, KRW 277,308,445 of the real estate mortgage loan to the pro-Ba Savings Bank, a mortgagee, and KRW 18,40,000 of the ESM’s passenger car, which was actually paid on March 31, 2015, including KRW 16,360,965 of the retirement allowance (the total amount of KRW 54,264,480 of the total amount of KRW 54,480, excluding the property prohibited from seizure) and also includes KRW 312,069,410.

On the other hand, B bears the Plaintiff’s obligation of KRW 23,176,531, 3978,326, 18,203, 26,203, 26,725,203, and 64,943,195, and 19,303,130, total of KRW 156,390,588.

[Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Gap evidence Nos. 6, Gap 11, Eul evidence Nos. 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 5 and 8 (including several numbers), the head of Yeongdeungpo-gu, new bank, new bank, pro-friendly savings bank corporation, Korea Broadcasting System, the Korean Broadcasting System, the Korea CTR Bank, the Samsung Card Co., Ltd., the Samsung Card Co., Ltd., the Samsung Card Co., Ltd., the Samsung Card Co., Ltd., the case inquiry results, and the whole purport of the pleadings (2) determination, following the above facts finding.