1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. On July 22, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she was a taxi driver, and then tried to return home with his/her passengers getting off in the vicinity of the Young Military Station, and then getting out of Korea with his/her cab’s crime prevention and empty marking, etc., and the Defendant requested the boarding of the taxi and refused it.

However, the defendant reported the plaintiff's complaint in a false manner, which caused considerable mental damage to the plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money of one million won to the plaintiff.

2. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and evidence Nos. 1, the plaintiff filed a report with the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "the report of this case") on the following grounds: around 23:22, 2014; the defendant called the Dasan Call Center in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 22, 2014; and the defendant rejected the defendant's request for boarding because the plaintiff stops at the time of the defect; and the defendant's request for boarding was completed on the day of the defect; the defendant repeated that two passengers were able to board while driving a taxi, and again led to the occurrence of a crime, etc.; and the plaintiff's refusal to take two passengers; the plaintiff's guest was born to the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "the report of this case"); and the plaintiff's report of this case was submitted by the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office to the plaintiff on the ground that it violated the regulations on the crime prevention, etc. of taxi and passenger transport service."

However, the above facts alone are difficult to view that the Defendant reported the instant case with false content, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion on a different premise is without any need to further examine the amount of damages, etc.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.