Text
All appeals by the plaintiffs against the defendants are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
The Defendants of the underlying facts are doctors working in the L Hospital located in K in 1,00 (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Defendant E, H, and I are women in each mountain unit, Defendant F, and G are children, respectively, and Defendant J are medical specialists in anesthesia, among which Defendants G, H, I, and J are co- operators of the Defendant Hospital.
Plaintiff
C is a person who has a part of Plaintiff A at the Defendant Hospital, and Plaintiff B is a husband of Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D is a father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D is a person of Plaintiff A.
The plaintiff C (at that time, 31 years of age) passed from the defendant hospital to the delivery of the plaintiff A was a woman in childbed and was regularly diagnosed at the defendant hospital. At that time, there was no special opinion on the above plaintiff and the fetus with the exception of the umbaum umbulum umumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumumum (deumumumumumumumumumumumumumum
In Table 1, at the time of M, the plaintiff C was hospitalized in the defendant hospital at intervals of about 08:46, at the end of 09:00 2 cm-3 10:00 cm-3 3 cm-3 12:0 4 cm-3 0 cm-3 8 to 10 cm-3 - 3 cm- 40 cm, pregnant, at the intervals of about 40 minutes (hereinafter the same day is omitted and only time is entered). The plaintiff C was hospitalized in the defendant hospital at intervals of about 08:46, and thereafter labor rec records (hereinafter referred to as "profed records") after that time are as shown in Table 1 attached hereto.
At around 10:09, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital administered the Plaintiff C with light-to-door anesthesia, and around 10:10, the Defendant Hospital administered 10 unit oxtocin 10 unit. At around 12:40, the Plaintiff C’s pulse was pulse, and around 12:33, at around 12:5:54, from around 12:54 to 12:18, from around 12:33, the Defendant Hospital had no dispute between the parties with respect to the Plaintiff A’s embryobide cule cule 10 unit.
Until now, there was no special error in the volume of the Plaintiff A’s fetus heartide (hereinafter referred to as “herebideideideideide”).
The medical personnel of the defendant hospital opened the body of the plaintiff C at around 13:18, and 3.1kg of body.