Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On May 1, 2015, the Korean Democratic Labor Union Federation (B; hereinafter referred to as the "Korean Labor Union Federation") held the Democratic Labor Union Act in the presence of 22,000 members, such as the Korean Labor Union members, at the Seoul plaza located in 15:20, Jung-gu, Seoul, Seoul, by around May 1, 2015.

The 20,000 participants began from 16:30 on the same day after the completion of the assembly to the 20,000 members of the Assembly, and from 16:30 on the same day, the Seoul Square Ro-ro 2 was driving along the Seoul Square 2 lanes of the Seoul Square-ro 2.

However, the participants of the assembly went to 16:48 on the same day at the end of 16:48 and went to the port of safe by leaving the reported route.

Defendant participated in the demonstration team that left the parallel route as above, and occupied 3,00 persons of the demonstration at around 17:59 on the same day, and occupied the lane prior to the distance of the movement in front of the DNA dental department in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with the demonstration participants to obstruct the traffic on the land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A report on assembly, the flow of assembly, the photograph of the assembly, and the overall situation;

1. Evidentiary photographs;

1. Each internal investigation report, 【The number of participants in the assembly of this case, total time required by the participants in the assembly of this case, including the defendant, until the time when occupation and use of the roads of the participants in the assembly of this case begins, specific demonstration, such as the movement routes of demonstration teams by each sector, the time and developments leading up to the blocking of the road by the police forces, the degree of traffic interference caused by the demonstration of this case, and the progress before and after the passage of the assembly of this case, etc., the police controlled the roads adjacent to the site, such as the installation of a parking wall, etc. in order to prevent the progress

Even if the participants in the assembly such as the defendant have committed an act significantly deviating from the reported scope, the defendant's act and the defendant's act are considered to be the result.