logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.10 2015고정4383
일반교통방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 24, 2015, from around 08:00 to around 24:00, the president of the Korean Democratic Workers’ Union (hereinafter referred to as “the president of the Korean Workers’ Union”) held the Act among the participation of 20,00 members, such as the president and the president of the Korean Workers’ Union in the Seoul Square-ro 2-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, and reported on an outdoor assembly in which the two-lanes of the progress direction to the Seoul Square-ro, while holding the Act from around 16:00 on April 24, 2015 to 18:00.

As a result, from around 13:30 on April 24, 2015 to around 16:45, in the participation of approximately 8,80 members such as members, the president held a “private-class worker competition” from Seoul square to the society of the class C in Seoul square. At around 16:45 on the same day, approximately 7,000 persons among the participants in the above assembly began to proceed by using the two-way way from Seoul square to the end of the parallel. At around 17:16 on the same day, around 4,00 persons who participated in the assembly, approximately 4,00 persons who participated in the assembly depart from the route of the first report from the end of 2 A to the end of 17:16 on the same day, and approximately 3,000 persons who participated in the assembly including the Defendant, including the Defendant, left the first report route from the end of 1 on the same day.

2. On April 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) participated in the said Korean Labor Competition Act; and (b) around 3,000 participants from around 17:16 to 18:36 of the same day, and (c) one lane in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jongno-gu, Seoul, along with approximately 3,00 participants, occupied an intersection prior to the intersection.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with approximately 3,00 participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic of the land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copies of a documentary evidence after perusal;

1. A photographics taken over;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (report on assembly and information status);

1. Article 185 of the Criminal Act, Articles 185 and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order

arrow