A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 5. 28. 22:44 경 의정부시 C에 있는 ‘D’ 앞 노상에서, ‘ 사람이 쓰러져 잔다’ 는 내용의 112 신고에 따라 현장에 출동한 의정부 경찰서 E 지구대 순경 F, 경장 G가 피고인에게 “ 여기서 주무시면 위험하니까 일어나서 집에 귀가 하세요 ”라고 말하자, 위 F, G를 향하여 “ 꺼져, 이 새끼야”, “ 가, 이 씨 발 놈 아”, “ 너 몇 살이야, 꺼져 ”라고 욕설을 하고, 피고인이 깔고 누워 있던 방석을 오른손으로 쥐고 휘둘러 위 F의 목을 1회 때리고, 이를 제지하는 위 G의 오른쪽 얼굴을 주먹으로 1회 때리고, 이에 위 G가 피고인을 공무집행 방해죄의 현행범으로 체포하려 하자 발로 위 G의 좌측 정강이를 2~3 회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives and bodies of the police officers and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A criminal investigation report (to confirm the situation of a DNA camp);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs of parts of damage, badic cinematographic data;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Where an act of assault or intimidation is committed against multiple public officials who perform the same duties as commercial concurrence, the act of assault or intimidation is established according to the number of public officials who perform the official duties, and where the act of assault or intimidation was committed in the same place at the same time, and is assessed as one act in light of social norms, the act of assault or intimidation committed in the same manner is in a relationship of conceptual concurrence;

In other words, the Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505 Decided June 25, 2009, etc.). Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. As to the instant crime on the grounds of sentencing selective sentencing of sentence, there is a need to strictly punish the Defendant in a light of the public authority, even though it is necessary to punish the Defendant.