logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.11.12 2015가합1790
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 189,480,551 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 6% per annum from April 21, 2015 to May 4, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who supplies fire-fighting equipment materials, etc. with the trade name D.

The Hansan Co., Ltd. is a company that operates equipment construction business.

B.1) On October 31, 2013, Hansan Co., Ltd. filed an application for commencement of rehabilitation procedures on October 31, 2013 (Seoul Central District Court 2013 Gohap225), and received a decision to authorize rehabilitation procedures on Nov. 29, 2013, and thereafter received a decision to authorize rehabilitation plans on Apr. 22, 2014, and B was appointed as a manager of Hansan Co., Ltd., a rehabilitation company. However, the above court decided to discontinue rehabilitation procedures on Aug. 24, 2015 on the ground that Hansan Co., Ltd., the rehabilitation company failed to implement the rehabilitation plan properly and it is evident that it is impossible to implement the future rehabilitation plan.

The above decision was finalized on September 8, 2015, and the Hansan District Court was declared bankrupt by the Seoul Central District Court 2015Hahap125 on the same day, and the defendant was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy and taken over the litigation procedure of this case on September 16, 2015.

(c) The case of Hansan Co., Ltd., the rehabilitation company:

B. 1) After the commencement of the rehabilitation procedure described in paragraph (1), the construction was carried out at the construction site in several hundreds. The Plaintiff supplied materials necessary for each construction site from December 2, 2013 to October 2014 at the request of the manager B, and the cost of materials was paid in lump sum as of the end of each month. D. The Plaintiff was determined on December 26, 2014 as to the provisional attachment claim against the Nonghyup Bank Co., Ltd., Ltd., the Korea-Japan Bank, the Korea-Japan Bank, the Korea-Japan Bank, and the Korea-Japan Bank with the claim for the above material cost as the claim for the above material cost. (Seoul Western District Court Decision 2014Kahap860, Jan. 1, 201, the Plaintiff was determined on the provisional attachment claim against the rehabilitation company B, the administrator of the Seoul Western District Court, the No. 2014hap860, the No. 16000, Nov. 1, 200, the New Bank.

arrow