The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months and by a fine of 150,000 won.

The defendants are the defendants.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the punishment of the lower court (the maximum term of one year, the short term of ten months and the fine of three hundred thousand won, the defendant B: the imprisonment of a maximum term of one year, the short term of one year and two months, the short term of one year and the fine of three hundred thousand won) is too unreasonable;

2. Determination

A. Although Defendant A received juvenile protective disposition twice due to the theft suspicion, Defendant A planned the allocation of roles with accomplices for a period of 2 months, Defendant A committed the 13-time special larceny crimes, the 4-time special larceny crimes, the 3-time special larceny crimes, and the 3-time licenseless driving crimes. Defendant A committed the three-time illegal uttering of official document in the course of disposing of the 2-time larceny crimes and the stolen stolen stolen property.

The amount of damage caused by the above crime reaches 21 persons, and the amount of damage reaches 16 million won.

In light of the frequency and method of such crimes, the degree of damage, etc., Defendant A's crime is very poor, so it is necessary to punish the corresponding severe punishment.

However, Defendant A’s mistake is divided and has been detained for more than five months, and therefore, it is obvious that he has shown that he had shown in mind the instant crime. Defendant A is highly likely to live as a sound member of society according to the degree of edification as a juvenile under the age of 18. Defendant A’s effort by his parents, agreed with the rest of 21 victims except 3 victims, and a considerable amount of money has been deposited to the said 3 victims. Defendant A was only subject to suspension of indictment on one occasion and two juvenile protective orders, without criminal records, and all of the sentencing conditions stated in the instant arguments, such as Defendant A’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., it is recognized that the punishment imposed by the lower court is inappropriate.

B. Defendant B also constitutes Defendant B.