1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

The relevant Plaintiff A takes charge of the practical guidance of students at each D Arts High School (hereinafter “instant school”) from September 1, 2001 to August 3, 2016, from March 2, 2009 to January 30, 2016, from March 2, 2009 to January 30, 2016, and Plaintiff C from March 2, 201 to January 30, 201, respectively.

The defendant is a local government that establishes and operates the school of this case.

Since around 2006, after-school operation of the school of this case, after-school was operated at elementary, middle, and high schools nationwide. The Chungcheongnam-nam Office of Education also operates after-school in order to reduce private education expenses, reduce education gap, and to supplement and expand the function of school education through the realization of local community schools.

For the operation of after-school schools in this case, a demand for students and parents were examined and a plan was formulated once or twice a year, and the operating committee deliberated on the overall matters concerning the operation of after-school schools, such as operating methods, operating hours, program opening, instructors, tuition fees, and tuition fees, on two occasions in the first half of the year and the second half of the year before the beginning of the semester.

The instant school announced the recruitment of instructors on its school homepage, and determined that persons who possess four-year college graduates and equivalent qualifications, or who currently attend a university or attend a lecture or attend a lecture on other pre-announcements, with the qualification standards for art and practical guidance instructors, are excellent in practical guidance ability, but those who are operating a private teaching institute or a teaching school in the astronomical city are excluded.

On September 1, 2001, Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B on March 2, 2009, and Plaintiff C as a practical instructor on March 2, 201, respectively, through documentary examination, practical examination, and interview with the Plaintiffs. Since then until 2014, a new employment examination was not deemed to be a new employment examination, it was re-commissioned by the operating committee only twice a year on whether it is appropriate for them in the first half and second half.

. The above.