The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not have intention to commit an indecent act by force.

2. Determination

A. On April 25, 2017, the facts charged in the instant case revealing the part of the Defendant’s body back to the victim D (the age of 26) from the subway 2 lines set up in subway C, located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, at around 12:30 on April 25, 2017, the Defendant carried the part of the Defendant’s body attached to the victim’s her her tack, and her macks the victim’s right mack.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

[....]

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged.

(c)

In light of the following circumstances recognized by the records of the instant case’s deliberation, it is difficult to believe the victim’s statement that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case as it is, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is sufficient to prove that the Defendant was forced to commit an indecent act.

It is difficult to see it.

Defendant’s assertion of mistake is with merit.

① The Defendant did not have her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

② The victim stated in the investigative agency that “the Defendant was frightened by the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

③ The CCTV images of this case followed the victim and got a relatively rapid walk to the subway.