All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant’s assertion of mistake of the facts 1) The Defendant’s forced indecent act against the victim E (limited to this paragraph simply referred to as “victim”) did not have any knife by inserting the knife in the middle of the victim E (only referred to as “the victim”). The Defendant merely carried the knife at the right shoulder of the victim at the level of education or encouragement, and there was no knife with the victim, and then there was no knife with the victim, and there was no knife and knife with the victim’s knife and knife with the victim, and there was no knife with the victim’s knife and the surrounding knife, and there was no knife with the victim.

The defendant's assertion is supported by the fact that the defendant's genes is not detected in the inside of the victim's body, unlike the detection of the defendant's genes in the outside of the victim's body, and that there is a change between the defendant and the victim in the toilet and that it is virtually difficult for the defendant to take 10 minutes of the victim's chest after the victim's body living alone. According to the victim's statement, the part of the defendant's body is bound to be sealed into the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Therefore, the victim's statement against this is not reliable.

However, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact that all the charges of forced indecent acts against the victim were guilty, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2) The Defendant with respect to compulsory indecent act against the victim F is merely a victim F’s shoulder or knife knife with the victim F’s shoulder, and the victim’s knife with knife, and there is no buckbucks or snife with knife.

At that time, it is a rapid decline of H.