logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.07.12 2018나60922
부당이득금 반환
Text

1. Each of the plaintiffs' appeals is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part concerning Chapters 4, 15, and 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. As such, the part concerning this case is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. In full view of the whole purport of each entry and pleading in the evidence Nos. 44 and 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, C, upon the final default of payment of discounted promissory notes, has received a final and conclusive judgment against the plaintiff et al. to win the claim for the payment of promissory notes under the Busan District Court Decision 2009Ga36261, which decided the principal and interest of the above amount of the bill in the voluntary auction procedure of this case where the judgment of the court of first instance was made as preserved claim No. 42 million won, it is recognized that the plaintiff B had already received the final and conclusive judgment of the court of first instance to claim the same cause as the lawsuit in this case against the plaintiff B.

2. The judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow