(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.10.15 2014고정1088

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.10.15 2014고정1088

업무상과실치상

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the entrance of the D1st floor parking lot located in Daejeon Sung-gu, Daejeon, on August 4, 2013, at around 12:30, the head of the general division of food products belonging to D, loaded and driven the plastic boxes of the home plug at about 2 meters and moved to the front line for the transportation of goods. In such a case, the driver is a passage of a parking lot where the home plug’s customers are frequently traveling off at the time. In such a case, the driver is not obliged to cut the plastic boxes loaded in the copper-gu, so that the plastic boxes do not fall off properly by snicking them, and even if he was negligent in performing his duty of care to prevent the accident, he suffers from injury to the right side of the victim, such as the victim’s entrance into the front line, and the victim’s entrance into the front line, and the victim’s 32nd of G 1st of G plug at the entrance of the D1st floor parking lot.

Summary of Evidence

1. A partial statement of the defendant (the purport that he/she does harm his/her stuff) in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H;

1. A letter of postal service with H;

1. CCTV images at the accident site;

1. A medical certificate and a written confirmation of hospitalization;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act alleged to the effect that “the victim’s injury cannot be deemed to have been sustained by the victim because the victim’s injury was extremely minor even if the victim’s injury was not contacted or contacted with the vehicle driven by the Defendant F.” However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the above gambling is the victim F.

참조조문

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2015.05.28 2014노3200

-대구지방법원 2015.09.03 2015나4045

-부산지방법원 2018.07.18 2018고단619

-서울남부지방법원 2016.11.24 2015가합111892

-대구지방법원 2017.06.02 2016노4098