The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (the factual error) cannot be deemed as having caused “injury” beyond the scope naturally cured to the victim because the degree of the injury is extremely insignificant even if the victim did not contact or contacted the vehicle driven by the victim. Thus, the causal relationship between the Defendant’s act and the injury of the victim cannot be acknowledged.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and admitted by the court below, the following facts are revealed: ① the victim was frightened by the victim at 1strush, etc.; ② the victim was consistently stated by the investigative agency to the effect that satisf was damaged by satisf, etc.; ② the victim was diagnosed on August 5, 2013 to the effect that satisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisf, and that satfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfat, and that satfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisf, and that satfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisfisf, and that satfisfisfisfisfisfisfisf.