logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 09. 25. 선고 2019두42808 판결
(심리불속행) 형사판결의 인정사실에 나타난 자금세탁 목적으로 모의 계좌에서 이 사건 계좌로 이체한 금원은 증여에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2019-Nu-34915 (Law No. 16, 2019)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2017west 4432 ( December 21, 2017)

Title

(A) The money transferred from the parent's account to the account of this case for the purpose of money laundering as shown in the fact that the criminal judgment is recognized shall constitute a donation.

Summary

(2) In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff’s right to ownership or disposal was finally vested in the Plaintiff at the time of deposit in the account in the mother’s account and the Plaintiff’s gratuitous transfer of property is deemed to have occurred, barring special circumstances where it is difficult to adopt a factual judgment on the facts of the relevant civil and criminal trial.

Related statutes

Articles 2 and 2 of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Article 23 of the Enforcement Decree of the former Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2019Du42808 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff

AA

Defendant

a) the Director of the Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

September 25, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is clear that it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per

arrow