All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In light of the time and place of commission of an act of violence and the degree of violence as shown in the method of commission of an act of violence and the attitude of an act of violence, etc., the defendant should be punished for a strict punishment in light of the following: (a) the time and place of commission of an act of violence; and (b) the degree of violence as shown in the method of commission of an act of violence and the attitude of an act.

However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes and committed a mistake in depth; (b) the Defendant is the most responsible for the livelihood of the denial and his/her father and wife; (c) there is no penalty heavier than the suspension of execution; and (d) the Defendant did not want the Defendant’s punishment by demanding the victims and demanding a letter of apology; and (b) the Defendant’s consciousness and desire to leave the Defendant’s wife against the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is deemed to be appropriate; and (c) it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per