1. It is confirmed that 3/840 shares out of 1,105 square meters of river B in Ansan-si, Ansan-si are owned by the plaintiff;

2. The plaintiff's remainder.

1. Basic facts

A. Each I (I, address, and official space) stated in the Land Survey Book prepared in the Japanese colonial era as of September 19, 1910 that each of the first 1548 E, F 57, G 376, and H 453 et al. (I, address: official space) was received on September 19, 1910.

B. The land indicated in paragraph (1) of this case (hereinafter “instant land”) is divided from the above-mentioned land and thus unregistered.

C. On February 7, 1933, the Plaintiff’s Line J (J, permanent domicile: CJ) died and succeeded to the property solely by Australia’s heir L. On February 12, 1962, M, N,O (P, Q, R, and S, the wife’s children, died on November 20, 1953) jointly inherited the property.

M died on December 23, 1966 and jointly succeeded to the property of T, U, V, W, and X, a child, and on August 31, 201, T jointly succeeded to the property of T, U, V, W, and X, and on August 31, 201, T, the wife of T, Y, South Z, AB (the Plaintiff, AC, and D, the husband of which died first on April 18, 207).

The Plaintiff’s share of inheritance is 3/840, such as the statement in the calculation sheet of the attached share of inheritance.

Of Q’s successors, AE filed a lawsuit against the Defendant regarding his share of inheritance among the instant land in question with the Seoul Central District Court No. 2012da141622, 2013da77834, 2014da534975, and won each of the said judgments. The above judgments became final and conclusive.

【Reasons for Recognition】 Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above-mentioned facts, it is reasonable to view the above-mentioned situation land as the same person in light of the following facts: (a) the person under whose name was the Chinese name and his address coincide; and (b) there is no evidence that the person under whose name was the JJ in the vicinity of the above address had been the same person.

In addition, a person who is registered as a landowner in a land survey report or forest survey report shall be presumed to have been assessed as a landowner and the situation thereof is determined unless there is any reflect on the change in the situation by the ruling.