1. The defendant's KRW 39 million and its weight to the plaintiff

(a) The rate of KRW 38 million shall be from March 31, 2014 to the date of full payment.

On November 20, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract with the Defendant to receive KRW 40 million from the Defendant instead of acting for the preparation of documents and procedures necessary for the construction of a factory on the ground level 221, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, and the Defendant, as a result of the performance of the service, newly constructed a factory on January 20, 2014 and newly constructed a factory on May 10, 2014. Accordingly, the Defendant shall pay 38 million won out of the above service charges to the Plaintiff by March 30, 2014, and if so, the fact that the Plaintiff prepared and delivered a memorandum to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 2% per month for the accounts payable to the Plaintiff is not disputed between the parties or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 4.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 24% per annum, which is the agreed delay damages rate from March 31, 2014 to the date of full payment, with the exception of the remaining KRW 39 million, excluding the amount of KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for the above service charges of KRW 40,000,000,000,000,000,000 from September 8, 2015, which is the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, to the plaintiff, to the extent of the existence and scope of the above service charges of KRW 38,00,00,000,00,000,000,000 from the day following the day of full payment.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit.