A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 5, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement, etc. in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of the Defendant, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 13, 2017.

1. Fraud;

A. The Defendant, at the C office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around December 13, 2015, would give the victim D a small-sum loan of one million won to the market merchants and, if he/she invests money in the small-sum lending company that collects within one month from the month to the second month, he/she would make a profit of 10 to 30% of the principal.

“The purpose of this is to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not think that he would consume the money from the damaged person due to living expenses, etc., and operated the money in a way to prevent the return, and even if he received money from the damaged person as the name of investment, he did not have an intention or ability to pay the principal or profit normally.

As such, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table from December 13, 2015 to March 6, 2016, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim to transfer KRW 215,00,000 from December 13, 201 to the Nong Bank account in the name of E, as stated in the list of crimes in the name of investment funds.

B. On July 23, 2014, the Defendant called the “F” used vehicle trading company located in Ansan-si around July 23, 2014 to the said victim and transferred the purchase cost of KRW 2 million to the said victim.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not intend or have the ability to divide the profits into the victim because he did not purchase the vehicle normally even if he received the purchase cost of the vehicle from the victim, and he thought that the vehicle would be consumed by repayment of the obligation.

On July 23, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 2 million from the victim to the E Nonghyup Bank account in the name of the victim for the purpose of purchasing vehicles.

(c)

On July 24, 2014, the Defendant is identical to the foregoing paragraph B.