The punishment of the accused shall be determined by one year and six months.

Of the costs of lawsuit, the part concerning witness E, C and D shall be the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1749"

1. Fraud to victims E;

A. On June 1, 2014, the Defendant plans to add the specialty points of importation from the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu to the victim E in a comprehensive playground located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu.

If N.N. invests 20 million won, 20 million won will be paid for each month's investment revenue and 20 million won will be refunded for the principal of investment after one year.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, even if the Defendant received money from the injured party for the purpose of investment, he did not operate a specialized store for import, and was thought to consume it for illegal entertainment of sports sports so that he did not have any intent or ability to reduce investment proceeds and principal.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 3.7 million from the injured party on September 17, 2014, and KRW 14.6 million on September 18, 2014 from the Defendant’s account under the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 14.6 million on a total as investment money.

B. On April 15, 2015, the Defendant demanded the victim to pay the investment proceeds during telephone conversations with the victim at a closed place, and the victim “the fact was not a driving specialist, but was engaged in illegal gambling of sports soil.”

There is a seizure of a passbook in which the police has the control over gambling, but only 5 million won has been loaned, and in September 2015, a total of 20 million won will be refunded by adding the amount of the existing investment principal and the interest of 5 million won.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, at the time, the head of the Tong at the time the defendant had no balance, and the defendant had no intention or ability to return all existing investment and borrowed money in September 2015, even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, because he/she had borrowed money from others than the victim under the pretext of investment or borrowed money.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and borrowed five million won from the victim on the same day.