logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.01.08 2015고단4263
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 21, 2014, the Defendant, at the court of Gwangju District Court No. 401 on August 21, 2014, determined that the Korea Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Housing”) was present as a witness of the Plaintiff in the Gwangju District Court 2014Guhap 10561, which was brought against the Commissioner of the National Tax Service of Gwangju District Court, and gave testimony after going through the attendance of the Plaintiff in the case of claiming cancellation of the disposition of notification of change in income amount, and that “the board of directors of the Plaintiff shall issue 10,000 won per share by the method of shareholder allocation, and shall increase the total amount of KRW 2.6 billion per share, but it shall be decided that a witness, D, and E who is difficult for the Plaintiff to prepare the capital increase, and that the witness, D, and E shall pay the capital increase due

“To answer the question of the Plaintiff’s agent.”

The answer is that “the Plaintiff has increased 2.6 billion won over three occasions and issued new shares 2.60,000 won, and F is required to directly procure KRW 800,000,000,000 which is necessary for acquiring KRW 1.440,000,000,000,000 won, and to pay the remainder KRW 240,000,000 from the Plaintiff.

“To answer the question of the Plaintiff’s agent.”

“On the other hand, the witness, D, and E, who are the remaining shareholders, have leased 520 million won to the Plaintiff and paid the full amount of KRW 520 million necessary to acquire 52,000 shares respectively.

“The Plaintiff’s agent responded to the question “.....”

However, in fact, the Korea Housing Construction did not lend the price necessary for stock acquisition to F, Defendant, D, and E, and did not hold a board of directors decision making a loan.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the F part concerning the statement);

1. Commencement report of investigation:

1. A copy of the complaint, a copy of each registry, a copy of notification of the results of tax investigation, a standard for income taxation, and a copy of calculation details of tax amount;

arrow