Defendants shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 3, 2016, at the parking lot located in Junggu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul around 21:40, Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to take care of his taxi owned by the victim against the victim, and expressed the victim’s desire to do so. Defendant A expressed the victim’s openly insulting the victim at the location of four police officers, such as the police officer F, etc., who belongs to the Seoul Jungdong Police Station Epia that received a report from the victim.

2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties were asked by the police officer F of the Seoul Central Fran Police Station E police box, who was dispatched after receiving the above D’s report at the above time, at the above time, and at the above place, to “I am home and home to the reporter”, and the Defendant F was assaulted by the F, such as putting the chest of the above F at hand, and putting the F’s arms at hand, putting the f’s chest at hand, putting the f’s chest, putting the f’s chest together with Defendant B, putting the f’s baits, putting the f’s baits at hand, and cutting the f’s baits.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officer F's 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written complaints filed in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the report of investigation;

1. The Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; Article 311 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. A aggravated defendant for concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case is committed on the grounds of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which leads to the crime of this case, and Defendant A has two times the records of being sentenced to a fine due to driving of alcohol, etc., and Defendant B has two times the records of being sentenced to a fine due to the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation, etc.