1. On August 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) on March 4, 2013, the Korean Bank Corporation Card (Korean Card C) of Han University for the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff shall be the professor of B University located in Busan D and the chairperson of the E organization.

On July 16, 2018, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to disclose information on the details of use (the user, use, and amount indicated) and copies of the disbursement resolution (hereinafter “information of this case”) from March 4, 2013 to October 30, 2015 of the “Korea Bank Corporation Card (Korea CardC)” (hereinafter “instant information”).

(hereinafter “instant request for information disclosure”). The Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the extension of the period for decision on whether to disclose the instant request.

On August 9, 2018, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the non-disclosure decision on the instant information on the ground that “(i) the request for the provision of specific data on the use of the business use card for a long period of time (for a period of 32 months or longer) to the extent that would impede the performance of the ordinary business of the relevant department (for 32 months or longer), and (ii) the information that is reasonably deemed to significantly impede the performance or research and development of the work consistent with the public nature of the university and college (which appears to be a clerical error under Article 9(1)5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act of the Public Institutions).”

(hereinafter “Disposition” (hereinafter “instant Disposition”). Inasmuch as there is no dispute, the entry of Gap evidence No. 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff defendant's assertion of the parties to the instant information in the Ministry of Education at the time of accounting audit on or around March 2016, it does not request the plaintiff to provide data to the extent that the plaintiff may interfere with the defendant’s ordinary performance of duties, and it cannot be said that the defendant’s interest protected by non-disclosure of the instant information does not exceed the citizen’s right to know and transparency in the execution of school expenses accounts. Thus, the instant information does not constitute non-disclosure information under the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Act”).

Nevertheless, the instant information.