A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

around 03:20 on December 18, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the management of the victim’s letter or the place of business by force for about one hour, such as scambling, scambling, scambling, and scambling, scambling, scambling, and scambling, scambling, and scambling, scambling, and scams.

The Defendant, on July 24, 2018, from around 04:42 to 04:55 on July 24, 2018, 2018, collected stones in the vicinity of the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F Victim G management “H”, and damaged the market value of the 2nd head of the Nowon-gu Free will.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 4"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E-statement 2018 Maz. 2657 Maz.;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the G Statements Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Penalty provisions: Article 314 (1) or 366 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: The punishment through punishment is required in full view of the following: (a) the scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple concurrent crimes in the basic area (of April or October) (the scope of recommending punishment) of the basic area (of June or June) (the scope of recommending damage, etc.) (the scope of property damage, etc.) (the scope of recommending punishment): One type of crime; (b) the scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple concurrent crimes: six months to November; (c) the background of the case from June to November; (d) the same kind of records including the suspension of execution; and (d) the short-term crimes after the expiration of the period of suspension of execution.

It seems that there is no punishment for sacrifies or employees, but rather the acceptance of the victim's genuine intention, not the acceptance of the victim's genuine intention, but the unstable location of the business, consideration of the customers, etc. are considered only as a general sentencing factor.