logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2012.11.21 2012고단1570
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 1570]

1. On May 24, 2012, the Defendant interfered with business on May 24, 2012: (a) around 14:00 on May 24, 2012, and from around 14:20 on the same day to 14:20 on May 24, 2012, the Defendant told the victim of the fact that the victim filed a complaint against another case before the nuclear department office in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, the victim stated

After that, in order for police officers dispatched after receiving a report from the victim to show the defendant out of the victim, the defendant was imprisoned with a greater sound, and the victim was unable to properly treat the patient by avoiding the disturbance, such as "to live in C, and to withdraw the complaint," thereby obstructing the victim's treatment and treatment of the patient.

2. On May 25, 2012, the Defendant, from around 13:15 to 13:50 on May 25, 2012, 2012, sought the victim for the said reasons at the place specified in paragraph (1) from around 13:15 to around 13:50 on the same day, and the victim forced the victim to enter the office by forcing him/her to enter the office, thereby obstructing him/her, and thereby obstructing the victim’s patient’s treatment and treatment by force.

3. The Defendant’s invalidation of public documents was investigated at the Seoul Gangseo-dong Police Station located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul on May 25, 2012 at around 15:30, on suspicion of interference with business, and requested a police officer slope F, who belongs to the above police station, to arrange a camera written by the Defendant in writing A4 and enter the content in the suspect interrogation protocol, and requested the Defendant to keep the suspect interrogation protocol available for inspection without disregarding it. However, the Defendant prepared by F, on the ground that F, would continue to peruse the suspect interrogation protocol.

arrow