1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s agricultural partnership delivers a building indicated in the attached Form, and from June 1, 2014, KRW 8,000,000 and KRW 1.

1. On December 1, 2012, the Plaintiff, as co-owners of the building indicated in the attached Form, leased the above building in KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 1,500,000 to Defendant B farming association (hereinafter “Defendant B farming association”), as co-owners of the building indicated in the attached Form, (i.e., funds for repair and remodeling of the above building shall be borne by the lessee himself/herself, but at the expiration of the contract, the lessee waives his/her financial rights without requiring the lessor), and (ii) the rent (18,00,000) was overdue for 12 months as of May 2014, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant farming association corporation of the termination of the lease on the grounds of overdue payment for at least three months, and (iii) Defendant C (the person registered as the auditor of the Defendant farming association, and the representative appears to be the mother of the above building) did not conflict between the parties, or the purport of the entire pleadings can be acknowledged as a whole number of evidence (including evidence number) stated in Gap1 through 7.

According to the above facts, since the above lease was lawfully terminated, the defendant partnership corporation shall deliver the above building to the plaintiff, and the overdue rent of 8 million won (the above 18 million won shall be deducted from the deposit amount) and the amount equivalent to the rent of 150 million won per month from June 1, 2014 to the day following the above base date shall be paid from June 1, 2014 to the day on which the delivery of the above building is completed, and the defendant C is obligated to leave the above building as the possessor.

The defendants defense that they cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim until they receive reimbursement of the beneficial costs or necessary expenses equivalent to approximately KRW 446.8 million invested in the process of remodeling the above building during the term of lease. However, as seen above, the parties agreed in the contract of lease that the costs of repairing and remodeling the above building should be borne by the lessee himself/herself and not to exercise the right to claim reimbursement of all costs. Thus, the above agreement is concluded.