A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 24, 2016, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: (a) on September 24, 2016, the Defendant: (b) on the 18:00 Barasan-si B operated by the Victim C (Woo 54 years old); (c) on the Kashter, the Defendant was able to sit and take a bath on the breac stairs under the influence of alcohol; and (d) on the part of the Kashter, the Defendant was unable to enter the customers, and (e) on the part of the Kashter, the Defendant was forced

"A book, dispute, direction-setting system, etc. on the knickter, which had been in the knickter, was sealed, throw away the table from the knick, etc., and interfered with the victim's operation of the singing practice room by force by avoiding the disturbance for about 30 minutes.

2. The Defendant damaged property by breaking up a 10,00 square meter at the time and at the place specified in paragraph 1, which is the victim’s possession on the Kabter, by throwing down a string sum of KRW 10,00,00, and destroying the 7,000, market price of which is equivalent to KRW 7,000.

3. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 제 1 항 기재 일시, 장소에서 112 신고를 받고 출동한 익산경찰서 E 지구대 소속 경찰관 경사 F이 자신을 제지하자 " 씨 발 놈들 아. 좆같은 놈들 아. 니 빽이 좋은가

Bohman “I ambling F’s left hand, etc. and assaulted F’s hand, etc. with his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officials on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, C, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing field photographs;

1. Articles 314(1), 366, and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business), and Articles 314(1) and 136(1) of the same Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) of the same Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;