logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2014.09.17 2014고단774
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 30, 2014, the Defendant interfered with his duties, and the Defendant, at the “D” restaurant operated by the Victim C (V, 62 years of age) in Scheon-si, Sacheon-si on June 30, 2014, the Defendant sent a door to the Defendant’s two arms on the ground that he is bad during drinking, on the ground that he does not drink, and “I will find out who is in the inside, do not perform funeral at the private-scale floor.” Around 22:10, 2014, the Defendant distributed a door to approximately 40 minutes of a disturbance by doing an act of gathering plastic chairs in its original form, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force, obstructing the victim’s restaurant business, preventing the victim from taking advantage of his parts, such as the victim’s scambling, etc., for about 14 days, and distributed it to the victim, such as a sexual scambing, etc.

2. On June 30, 2014, at the above restaurant around 22:50 on June 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was asked to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case from the F of the Sacheon Police Station E District Unit affiliated with the Sacheon Police Station E District, which the Defendant sent to the site after receiving a report of 112 that he would avoid disturbance; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant was bad, “this fake rings in question,” the Defendant took a bath to the effect that he would be bad; and (c) on the hand floor of the said slope G, he was sealed with the said slope G’s chest head in several instances; and (d) he was sealed with the slope G’s two arms; and (c) the F during the process of stopping it, he took a bath to the effect that “F is dead.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and the maintenance of on-site order by the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and H;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act in relation to the crime concerned, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act.

arrow