1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Description 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 20, 21, 22, 23, 1, 1, and 1, of each land listed in the separate sheet;

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties or may be acknowledged in full view of the following facts: Gap evidence 1-1-3, Gap evidence 2-1-2, Gap evidence 4-1 and 2-2; the result of this court’s on-site inspection; appraiser C’s results of the survey and appraisal conducted on July 15, 2016.

On September 25, 2002, the Plaintiff purchased each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”) and three-story buildings on the land listed in the separate sheet (1) and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same day.

나. 피고는 2005. 11. 1.경 이전에 이 사건 각 토지 중 별지 도면 표시 2, 3, 4, 5, 21, 22, 23, 1, 21, 2의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㉮부분 전체 및 ㉵부분 일부에 목조 단층 점포 가건물(이하 ‘이 사건 제1건물’이라 한다)을 불법으로 신축하고, 2014. 6. 1.경 이 사건 각 토지 중 별지 도면 표시 4, 6, 7, 20, 21, 5, 4의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㉯부분 전체 및 ㉵부분 일부에 목조 단층 점포 가건물(이하 ‘이 사건 제2건물’이라 한다)을 불법으로 증축하여, 이 사건 각 토지 중 별지 도면 표시 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 20, 21, 22, 23, 1, 2의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㉮, ㉯, ㉵부분 10.1㎡(이하 ’이 사건 점유부분‘이라 한다) 지상에서 ‘D’라는 상호로 테이크아웃 커피숍을 운영하고 있다.

2. Determination:

A. (i) On the basis of the determination of the cause of the claim, where a building constructed on another’s land is not unregistered and the ownership of the building is infringed on due to that building, the person obligated to remove the building is in a position to dispose of the building in a legal and de facto manner.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 91Da11278, Jun. 11, 1991). According to the facts acknowledged in the above basic facts, the Defendant is in a position to dispose of each of the instant buildings in a legal and de facto manner, barring special circumstances.