logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.02.16 2015고단3404
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 6, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Seoul Central District Court on May 17, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on May 17, 2013. On July 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for the crime of embezzlement at the Suwon Friwon, and completed the execution of the sentence on September 17, 2013.

[2015 Highest 3404] On September 13, 2015, the Defendant driven CK5 cars from the lake park parking lot located in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si to the front road in front of the Kimpo-si Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

[2016 Highest 941] On April 2015, the Defendant: (a) sold the victim D-owned Espact car; and (b) received the said car from the injured party.

On June 8, 2015, the Defendant arbitrarily used the said money as operating expenses for a store operated by the Defendant, while selling the said money to H for the victim by selling the said money in KRW 18 million at G stores located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and keeping the said money for the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

[2016 Highest 2389] Around September 2014, the Defendant had been aware of it at the Defendant’s office located in Yongsan-gu, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., in order to exchange the Defendant’s “N. L.S. car owned by N.S. and the halog car. L. P. P. P. P. P. L. first, if the Defendant transferred the Defendant’s car, it would pay the amount of installments remaining in the halog car.

“False speech” was made to the effect that it was “the victim was only the one who asked the victim about the accident history of the halog car.”

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any particular property, and since the rental car company operated did not have any income from the light of funds, there was no intention or ability to pay the above installments, and the above halog vehicle is the halogen vehicle.

arrow