1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants jointly deliver 157.50 square meters of a single-story store among the real estate listed in the attached list.

1. Claim against the defendant B

A. According to the reasoning of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5 and the whole arguments, the facts of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 to 5 can be acknowledged.

Therefore, the instant lease agreement is deemed to have been lawfully terminated. As such, Defendant B and Defendant C, the lessee, jointly with the Plaintiff, deliver to the Plaintiff 157.50 square meters of the first floor store among the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”). ② Defendant B, the lessee, has the obligation to pay the unpaid rent of KRW 19,950,00 (the unpaid rent that was not paid until March 6, 2019, prior to the sub-lease to the Defendant C), and ③ the Defendants jointly pay the unpaid rent of KRW 26,950,00 (the rent that was unpaid from March 7, 2019 to October 6, 2019) and the unjust enrichment of KRW 3,850,000 (the rent that was unpaid from March 7, 2019 to October 7, 2019).

B. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified.

2. Claim against Defendant C

A. The description of the claim is as shown in the [Attachment 2] of the Claim and the “the cause of the modified claim.”

(b) Judgment by based service by publication (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);