logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.19 2016고단276
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 18, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for habitual fraud by the Jeonju District Court on November 18, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jeonju prison on January 11, 2016.

The defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to alcohol acute addiction, and "2016 Highest 276 Highest 2016"

1. On January 22, 2016, around 23:50, the Defendant ordered “E” operated by the victim D of the victim D in the Southern-gu Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Underground-1, and the Defendant ordered two Tjus as if they would normally pay the alcohol price even if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price.

In other words, the Defendant was provided with two parallels with the market price of 260,000 won from the victim’s seat.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

"2016 Highest 388"

2. On January 20, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around 01:00 on January 20, 2016, at the H main store operated by the victim G in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju Northern-gu; and (b) the fact was committed as if he would normally pay the price despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price at that place; and (c) was obtained from the injured party with alcoholic beverages worth KRW 298,000 from the market price.

3. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around 22:40 on January 21, 2016, at the point of KK operated by the victim J in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (b) the Defendant, even if drinking at that place, was engaged in as if he would normally pay the price in spite of the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price; and (c) the Defendant, upon receiving alcoholic beverages of an amount equivalent to KRW 84,00,00 from the damaged person, acquired them by deception.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 276"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Written statements of D;

1. An invoice "2016 high group 388";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of G and J;

1. On-site photographs, details of orders, receipts, and previous records of judgment;

1. Criminal career data;

arrow