beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On June 12, 2014, no one shall operate a motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance on the road, but the defendant operated a B multilateral-type motor vehicle at the front of the C-W Intersection at the time of Gyeonggi-do interest and not covered by mandatory insurance.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Inquiry into the enemy;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;
1. Article 46(2)2 of the Act on Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation and the main text of Article 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (Amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 16, 2015); the selection of fines for criminal facts;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Normal circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The circumstances that are against the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) are identical: The defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of the crime in this case, and circumstances after the crime are dismissed; and
1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaged in driving a BD car.
On June 12, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car on June 12, 2014, and made a turn to the left at a speed of about 30km per hour from the head of the Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju District to the one-lane of the two-lane road from the head of the Jeju Jeju District.
A driver has a duty of care to make a left-hand turn after checking the right and the right and the right before the left-hand turn and checking the right and the right and the right and making a left-hand turn.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left without neglecting it and failed to find out E buses owned by Heung Transport Co., Ltd., Ltd., which are moving to the right from the left side of the running direction of the Defendant, and led to the shocking part of the bus driving part on the back side of the car driving seat of the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.